April 06, 2005
Windows vs Linux
Microsoft today launched a report claiming that Windows offered a more stable platform than Linux.
As described by Ina Fried at CNet:
Microsoft commissioned Veritest to create a scenario in which Linux and Windows administrators had to undertake a variety of tasks, such as provisioning servers and replicating data while responding to various failures and outages.
The Windows administrators completed 21 percent more of the proactive tasks, according to the study
However, the findings are controversial because the research was paid for by Microsoft, rather than an impartial third-party.
Also, the report fails to address whether the conditions of outages and failures would affect each operating system equally.
This is important, because anecdotal evidence suggests that Microsoft Windows provides a less stable environment to work with for online development.
Also, Windows machines are more likely to suffer security breaches, not least because of the much larger number of incompletely patched systems.
Also there are are a larger number of exploits against Windows machines, with nearly 250 trojans, viruses and worms already released against Windows this year to mid-March, and none reported for Unix operating systems.
Research by the Yankee Group, released earlier this month, found a faster recovery time for Windows servers after a security breach - at 13 hours recovery as opposed to 17.5 for Linux.
However, the study does not compare actual downtime of Windows and Linux machines in a live environment, which would be a more reliable basis for making comparisons.
Nevertheless, a report by the Register found that although a large number of smaller firms are turning to Linux and open source solutions for their businesses, the better development of Windows applications - not least graphics packages - was seen as a winning feature for Windows desktop machines.
Microsoft also today announced the delay of a planned version of Windows, intended to work with high performance server clusters, and emulate existing high performance computing requirements that Linux already handles. The launch of Windows Server 2003 Compute Cluster Edition is now expected in the second half of this year.
Posted at 01:38 PM
Discuss this in the Platinax Internet community forums
March 28, 2005
Gentoo release and Linux repackages
Gentoo Linux today launched its Gentoo Linux 2005.0 release, which aims to bring added functionality to the popular Linux software distribution.
While some people use Microsoft Windows as their operating system environment, Linux remains an increasingly popular alternative. Gentoo Linux is already one of the most popular free Linux distributions,
As well as added media compatibility, the Gentoo Linux 2005.0 release also includes a "complete security rebuild".
Additionally in the Linux world, Autopackage has been released, which is intended as a big step towards making it easier to install and use Linux software packages across different versions of Linux. As a rough analogy, it is like an equivalent to Windows Installer, and should simplify the process of using Linux for less experienced users, especially where software needs to be used across different "flavours" of Linux.
As stated on the Autopackage FAQ:
For users: it makes software installation on Linux easier. If a project provides an autopackage, you know it can work on your distribution. You know it'll integrate nicely with your desktop and you know it'll be up to date, because it's provided by the software developers themselves. You don't have to choose which distro you run based on how many packages are available.
For developers: it's software that lets you create binary packages for Linux that will install on any distribution, can automatically resolve dependencies and can be installed using multiple front ends, for instance from the command line or from a graphical interface. It lets you get your software to your users quicker, easier and more reliably. It immediately increases your userbase by allowing people with no native package to run your software within seconds.
Posted at 11:57 PM
Discuss this in the Platinax Internet community forums
March 20, 2005
Giants stand behind open source
IBM and Novell are pushing on the development of SUSE linux applications to run on IBM's eServer platforms.
The companies are seeking closer working ties, in terms of "consulting support and technical expertise" to help them develop applications for SUSE Linux on IBM platforms.
The move is part of a wider push by IBM to move Linux into the forefront of business technology, and has already spent years developing Linux for wider mainstream use.
Linux is an open source operating systemm developed from Unix, and comes in a number of "flavours", with SUSE Linux being a particular flavour developed by Novell.
Also this week, Google announced the opening of Google Code, which seeks to use programming languages such as C++ visual basic, and Python, for development of internet applications that could benefit the company.
This follows the earlier unveiling by Yahoo! of the Yahoo! Developer Network, which is intended to focus on development of products that utlise Yahoo! Search technology.
Posted at 09:39 PM
Discuss this in the Platinax Internet community forums
February 20, 2005
Red Hat: red face
Red Hat have acknowledged that in its push for mainstream markets, it has likely left behind crucial developer support - an issue it is now trying to correct.
Its problems center specifically on the restrictive development of the Fedora core for Red Hat Enterprise Linux, and how developers were left with little else to do but submit bug reports, rather than offer coding solutions.
The issue first came to a head in January as reported in Red Hat tries again with Linux enthusiasts. Now at the LinuxWorld Conference and Expo, the company admits its prior failings to engage developers, and is trying to draw them back in to the company, as reported in Red Hat: Fedora will engage customers.
This comes at a time of increasing competition in the open source movement, with Sun Microsystems planning on open source development of OpenSolaris.
Within Linux itself, there have been projects created as alternatives to Fedora, such as Ubuntu Linux, Whitebox Linux, and more established Linux distros, such as Gentoo, are enjoying an increasingly high profile.
Red Hat are planning on releasing Fedora Core 4 this year, which offers increased accessibility to IBM open source software, as well as allowing multiple operating systems to run with it.
Posted at 03:50 PM
Discuss this in the Platinax Internet community forums
February 18, 2005
IBM pushes Linux with $100 million
IBM has earmarked $100 million to fund a variety of technical, research and marketing initiatives to boost Linux use.
The initiative's are especially intended to help increase use of its open source Workplace software.
In 2001 IBM invested $300m into a 3-year Linux program, which included producing Linux versions of most of its available software.
Posted at 03:39 PM
Discuss this in the Platinax Internet community forums
January 26, 2005
Linux Mandrake patches released
A raft of patches for Linux Mandrake and its software applications, including a kernel fix, have been released today by Mandrakesoft.
The patches include no less than 5 deemed "highly critical" to prevent remote user access to a vulnerable machine.
However, despite the need for the patches, Linux machines remain better protected than Windows machines.
According to security firm Secunia, as many as 25% of PC's running Windows XP Home Edition remain unpatched, while less than 1% of Linux Mandrake machines are unpatched.
Fig. 1, Unpatched machines: Windows XP Home Edition
Fig. 2, Unpatched machines: Mandrake 9.x
Posted at 12:27 PM
Discuss this in the Platinax Internet community forums
January 16, 2005
IBM: offers free patents, offers to rebuild Linux kernel
Computing giant IBM last week announced plans to offer around 500 patents to the open source community, in a planned investment of open source development for industry.
As reported in IBM offers 500 patents for open-source use, the company does still retain vast number of patents by volume, suggested to be as many as 10,000. Crucially, however, the 500 includes an important set of 60, which were believed compromised by the development of Linux operating systems.
Following that announcement came a report from Linux Business Week, which claimed in Linux Kernel To Be Re-Written To Counter Microsoft FUD that a consortium of companies - including IBM and Intel, and starring Linux founder Linus Torvalds - will fund a project to rewrite the Linux kernel so that it is free of an estimated 283 patent infringements - specifically, 27 suggested related to filings by Microsoft, which has long been expected to launch patent-infringement suits on the developer community.
Posted at 10:18 PM
Discuss this in the Platinax Internet community forums
January 10, 2005
Linux security draws heated discussion
On Friday, iSec reported in Linux kernel uselib() privilege elevation of a serious vulnerability, which sees local users able to gain root privileges via binary format loaders' uselib() functions in Linux kernels 2.4 to 2.6.
Now Brad Spengler, of Linux Weekly News and the linux security development project GRSsecurity has launched a strong attack on the development of the Linux Security Modules development project.
In his LWN article grsecurity 2.1.0 and kernel vulnerabilities and Why doesn't grsecurity use LSM?, he attacks what he sees as a narrow approach to security, and especially to what he sees as the critical failure of the LSM to tackle the very security issues it is designed to actually deal with.
This comes at a critical time when many businesses are now looking beyond Microsoft's string of public failings on security issues to possible open source alternatives. And while open source has always suffered from a perception of being disorganised and lacking accountability from a business perpsective, the threat of current and future security problems already being compiled into the kernel may yet make companies think three times before investing in an IT framework on linux distros.
Until the row over security implementation on the linux kernel are addressed to the satisfaction of the linux developer community, it is hard to see how this latest development can instill business confidence in alternative options to Microsoft.
Posted at 01:32 PM
Discuss this in the Platinax Internet community forums
December 23, 2004
Redhat reports profit
Red Hat sold over 132,000 subscriptions to its Red Hat Enterprise Linux release, generating a Q3 profit of $10.8 million. Although a significant proportion of these licences discounted on price for large volume sales to purchasing businesses, the company had set itself higher sales targets. However, the revenue reported shows a company maturing, with over 6cents per share being returned to investors.
Interestingly enough, in Red Hat pulls out a profit, Chief Executive Matthew Szulik apparently:
preferred to tout deferred revenue--the subscription money that customers have pledged to pay but that Red Hat hasn't yet recognized. Deferred revenue increased to $121.4 million in the quarter, a 22 percent increase of $99.7 million from three months earlier and a 170 percent increase from $45.1 million from the year-earlier quarter.
Either way, a company finding its feet and growing healthily.
Posted at 01:35 PM
Discuss this in the Platinax Internet community forums
|